Anti-Gun Leader: Wants To Ban Free Speech As Well As Guns


Anti-Gun Leader: Want’s To Ban

Free Speech As Well As Guns

Dateline March 2, 2013 – Eugene, Oregon: The Leader of an anti-gun organization believes “anyone who buys a gun is mentally ill.” At a rally held by Ceasefire Oregon, David “Brazin’” Hazen, the Leader of the Eugene Chapter of the International Cities of Peace, goes on to advocate funding for “Universal Conflict Resolution Skill Support” as an alternative to firearms training. Mr. Hazen further advocates that “it should be a requirement for students at all levels, people incarcerated, applicants for the purchase of a gun, as well as every public employee and candidate for office be required to demonstrate their competency in conflict resolution“. The “church-lady lookalike concludes his talk by expounding his belief that the NRA might support the whole plan. No this piece is not from the Onion. Mr. Hazen’s speech highlights, uploaded in high definition, runs about 2 minutes.

Real News World Wide

All Stories Are Checked For News Accuracy

Follow us on twitter

-

http://realnewsworldwide.blogspot.com

http://linuxpower.wordpress.com/

http://reallygoodmovies.wordpress.com/

About these ads

The Bill of Rights is not negotiable – SHARE this urgent declaration


The Bill of Rights Is Not Negotiable –

SHARE This Urgent Declaration

Bill of Rights, 09/25/1789

Bill of Rights, 09/25/1789 (Photo credit: The U.S. National Archives)

(NaturalNews) There is a destructive, delusional meme spreading like a virus among many misguided Americans. It pushes the idea that government can pick and choose which rights codified in the Bill of Rights it wishes to recognize or discard on any given day.

This delusion is predicated on the concept that if a popular majority can be emotionally whipped into a frenzy over one particular right, then that right can simply be discarded and stricken from the Bill of Rights.

News World Wide

All Stories Are Checked For News Accuracy

(more…)

Mom Found ‘Guilty’ By Court After Refusing TSA Pat Down On Daughter


Mom Found ‘Guilty’ By Court After Refusing

TSA Pat Down On Daughter

Woman put on probation for standing up to security theater procedures

Steve Watson
Prisonplanet.com
Oct 24, 2012

A woman who stood up to TSA screeners and refused to allow them to grope her or her 14 year old daughter has been found guilty of “disorderly conduct” and sentenced to one year of probation by a court in Tennessee.

Back in July 2011, Andrea Fornella Abbott of Clarksville, was arrested by Nashville airport authorities for expressing outrage at the TSA procedures.

A police report stated that Abbott would not allow her daughter to be “touched inappropriately” or have her “crotch grabbed”. Abbott also refused to submit to a full body scan, saying that she did not want her or her daughters’ naked bodies revealed by the scanner.

The report noted that she attempted to take cell phone video of the incident but was prevented from doing so by the TSA screeners.

Tupperware            It Works

Full story here..

(more…)

Shut up and play nice: How the Western world is limiting free speech


Shut up and play nice: How the Western

world is limiting free speech

Freedom of speech

Freedom of speech (Photo credit: The Advocacy Project)

By Jonathan Turley, Published: October 12

 Free speech is dying in the Western world. While most people still enjoy considerable freedom of expression, this right, once a near-absolute, has become less defined and less dependable for those espousing controversial social, political or religious views. The decline of free speech has come not from any single blow but rather from thousands of paper cuts of well-intentioned exceptions designed to maintain social harmony.

 In the face of the violence that frequently results from anti-religious expression, some world leaders seem to be losing their patience with free speech. After a video called “Innocence of Muslims” appeared on YouTube and sparked violent protests in several Muslim nations last month, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon warned that “when some people use this freedom of expression to provoke or humiliate some others’ values and beliefs, then this cannot be protected.”

 It appears that the one thing modern society can no longer tolerate is intolerance. As Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard put it in her recent speech before the United Nations, “Our tolerance must never extend to tolerating religious hatred.”

Tupperware            It Works

(more…)

Obama Plans Attack On First Amendment if Re-elected


Obama Plans Attack On First Amendment

if Re-elected

English: Barack Obama delivers a speech at the...

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
June 15, 2012

Obama’s chief political strategist, David Axerlrod, announced earlier this week that the administration will push for a constitutional amendment to rollback free speech if his boss is re-elected in November.

“When we win, we will use whatever tools out there, including a constitutional amendment, to turn this back,” Axlerod said on Wednesday. “I understand the free speech argument, but when the Koch brothers can spend $400 million, more than the McCain campaign and the Republican Party spent last time, that’s very concerning.”

“This has never been done before — in 235 years — to make it possible for the government to control political speech in this country — a truly radical, astonishing thing to say out loud even if you believed it,” remarked Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell on Thursday.

(more…)

H.R. 347: Another Step in the Elimination of the First Amendment


H.R. 347: Another Step in the Elimination of the First Amendment

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
March 5, 2012

It is fairly obvious Obama and Congress rushed through H.R. 347 in order to curtail demonstrations that will undoubtedly occur during both Democrat and Republican conventions this summer. Also known as the “Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011,” the bill makes it a felony to disrupt or protest at any place or event attended by any person with secret service protection.

photo

“Current law makes it illegal to enter or remain in an area where certain government officials (more particularly, those with Secret Service protection) will be visiting temporarily if and only if the person knows it’s illegal to enter the restricted area but does so anyway,” Michigan Rep.Justin Amash wrote on his Facebook page. “[H.R. 347] expands current law to make it a crime to enter or remain in an area where an official is visiting even if the person does not know it’s illegal to be in that area and has no reason to suspect it’s illegal.”

Amash, Paul Broun, a Georgia Republican, and Ron Paul were the lone dissenting voices opposed to this bill, which is being called  the “First Amendment Rights Eradication Act” designed specifically to counter the Occupy movement and other political groups opposed to the bankster regime in control of the Congress and the presidency. Democrats have characterized opposition to the bill as “a whole lot of kerfuffle over nothing.”

Gene Howington, a guest blogger on law professor Jonathan Turley’s blog, contends that the government deliberately made the language of H.R. 347 vague and overly broad. Howington writes that “it seems to be a trend that vague or overly broad language could be fairly described as being purposefully adopted allowing ‘wiggle room’ for Federal authorities to potentially abuse civil and human rights under the color of authority.”

(more…)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 495 other followers

%d bloggers like this: